Retrospective and planning after iteration 2 » Historie » Verze 4
Jan Pašek, 2021-03-28 09:33
1 | 1 | Jan Pašek | h1. Retrospective and planning after iteration 2 |
---|---|---|---|
2 | |||
3 | 4 | Jan Pašek | *Date:* 26.03. 2021, 15:00 & 27.03. 2021 17:00 |
4 | 1 | Jan Pašek | *Present:* Jan Pašek, Michal Seják, Stanislav Král, David Friesecký |
5 | |||
6 | h2. Agenda |
||
7 | |||
8 | # Each of the team briefly evaluates the pros and cons of the iteration based on the following points: project state, project plan, team cooperation, tools, artefacts |
||
9 | # What shall be better in the next iteration? |
||
10 | # How did we managed to change problematic points from the previous retrospective? |
||
11 | 2 | Jan Pašek | # Other problems |
12 | # Evaluate if we achieved the iteration targets |
||
13 | # Synchronization discussion (short standup) |
||
14 | 1 | Jan Pašek | # Planning of the next iteration |
15 | |||
16 | h2. Conclusion |
||
17 | |||
18 | 4 | Jan Pašek | # Standa - Internal communication and cooperation were OK, communication with the customer was delayed, which caused redundant work on AIA extensions. |
19 | # Honza - Internal work of the team was OK, hopefully, the customer will cooperate better next time. Bigger decisions such as software architecture shall be discussed via a call instead of author-reader review. This cause unnecessary reworking of the architecture. |
||
20 | # Michal - architecture shall be discussed together next time and such tasks shall be planned for more people than one - more people involved means more knowledge. |
||
21 | # David - DB proposal said that he delivered the DB proposal later than he wanted. The team agreed that it caused no error, so no measures are necessary. |
||
22 | # The project achieved *LCOA* milestome |
||
23 | # All iteration targets were met. |
||
24 | # The problem with git->issue was fixed, everyone follows the conventions. |
||
25 | # Discussion about the final architecture was done in the whole team. |
||
26 | # Next iteration was planned - Target is to deliver a minimal functionality enabling the user to create and download certificates using a simple web gui. |