Retrospective and planning after it 5 » Historie » Verze 5
Jan Pašek, 2021-05-07 12:57
| 1 | 2 | Jan Pašek | h1. Retrospective and planning #5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 3 | Jan Pašek | |
| 3 | *Date:* 07.05. 2021, 15:00 |
||
| 4 | *Present:* Jan Pašek, Michal Seják, David Friesecký, Stanislav Král |
||
| 5 | |||
| 6 | h2. Agenda |
||
| 7 | |||
| 8 | # Each of the team briefly evaluates the pros and cons of the iteration based on the following points: project state, project plan, team cooperation, tools, artefacts |
||
| 9 | # What shall be better in the next iteration? |
||
| 10 | # How did we managed to change problematic points from the previous retrospective? |
||
| 11 | # Other problems |
||
| 12 | 4 | Jan Pašek | # Evaluate if we achieved the iteration targets - was IOC achieved? |
| 13 | 3 | Jan Pašek | # Synchronization discussion (short standup) |
| 14 | # Planning of the next iteration |
||
| 15 | |||
| 16 | h2. Conclusion |
||
| 17 | |||
| 18 | # Evaluation of the iteration: |
||
| 19 | |||
| 20 | 5 | Jan Pašek | * Honza: The team works perfectly, the process is well established. |
| 21 | 3 | Jan Pašek | |
| 22 | 5 | Jan Pašek | * David: The majority of tasks was finished during the first week, all went smooth. |
| 23 | 1 | Jan Pašek | |
| 24 | 5 | Jan Pašek | * Michal: Clean iteration, great cooperation, the process is well established. |
| 25 | 1 | Jan Pašek | |
| 26 | 5 | Jan Pašek | * Standa: Positive rating of the iteration, interesting workload, great cooperation. |
| 27 | # No process improvements were found. |
||
| 28 | # No problematic points were identified during the previous retrospective. |
||
| 29 | # As discussed during the standup, the first week of iteration was not as productive, but as stated on the standup, all issues were closed before the deadline. |
||
| 30 | # *Iteration targets were met!* The customer was satisfied with the application state. Change request from the previous iteration was implemented. |
||
| 31 | # *IOC* milestone was reached according to the project plan. |