1
|
Overview [![Build Status](https://travis-ci.org/lydell/js-tokens.svg?branch=master)](https://travis-ci.org/lydell/js-tokens)
|
2
|
========
|
3
|
|
4
|
A regex that tokenizes JavaScript.
|
5
|
|
6
|
```js
|
7
|
var jsTokens = require("js-tokens").default
|
8
|
|
9
|
var jsString = "var foo=opts.foo;\n..."
|
10
|
|
11
|
jsString.match(jsTokens)
|
12
|
// ["var", " ", "foo", "=", "opts", ".", "foo", ";", "\n", ...]
|
13
|
```
|
14
|
|
15
|
|
16
|
Installation
|
17
|
============
|
18
|
|
19
|
`npm install js-tokens`
|
20
|
|
21
|
```js
|
22
|
import jsTokens from "js-tokens"
|
23
|
// or:
|
24
|
var jsTokens = require("js-tokens").default
|
25
|
```
|
26
|
|
27
|
|
28
|
Usage
|
29
|
=====
|
30
|
|
31
|
### `jsTokens` ###
|
32
|
|
33
|
A regex with the `g` flag that matches JavaScript tokens.
|
34
|
|
35
|
The regex _always_ matches, even invalid JavaScript and the empty string.
|
36
|
|
37
|
The next match is always directly after the previous.
|
38
|
|
39
|
### `var token = matchToToken(match)` ###
|
40
|
|
41
|
```js
|
42
|
import {matchToToken} from "js-tokens"
|
43
|
// or:
|
44
|
var matchToToken = require("js-tokens").matchToToken
|
45
|
```
|
46
|
|
47
|
Takes a `match` returned by `jsTokens.exec(string)`, and returns a `{type:
|
48
|
String, value: String}` object. The following types are available:
|
49
|
|
50
|
- string
|
51
|
- comment
|
52
|
- regex
|
53
|
- number
|
54
|
- name
|
55
|
- punctuator
|
56
|
- whitespace
|
57
|
- invalid
|
58
|
|
59
|
Multi-line comments and strings also have a `closed` property indicating if the
|
60
|
token was closed or not (see below).
|
61
|
|
62
|
Comments and strings both come in several flavors. To distinguish them, check if
|
63
|
the token starts with `//`, `/*`, `'`, `"` or `` ` ``.
|
64
|
|
65
|
Names are ECMAScript IdentifierNames, that is, including both identifiers and
|
66
|
keywords. You may use [is-keyword-js] to tell them apart.
|
67
|
|
68
|
Whitespace includes both line terminators and other whitespace.
|
69
|
|
70
|
[is-keyword-js]: https://github.com/crissdev/is-keyword-js
|
71
|
|
72
|
|
73
|
ECMAScript support
|
74
|
==================
|
75
|
|
76
|
The intention is to always support the latest ECMAScript version whose feature
|
77
|
set has been finalized.
|
78
|
|
79
|
If adding support for a newer version requires changes, a new version with a
|
80
|
major verion bump will be released.
|
81
|
|
82
|
Currently, ECMAScript 2018 is supported.
|
83
|
|
84
|
|
85
|
Invalid code handling
|
86
|
=====================
|
87
|
|
88
|
Unterminated strings are still matched as strings. JavaScript strings cannot
|
89
|
contain (unescaped) newlines, so unterminated strings simply end at the end of
|
90
|
the line. Unterminated template strings can contain unescaped newlines, though,
|
91
|
so they go on to the end of input.
|
92
|
|
93
|
Unterminated multi-line comments are also still matched as comments. They
|
94
|
simply go on to the end of the input.
|
95
|
|
96
|
Unterminated regex literals are likely matched as division and whatever is
|
97
|
inside the regex.
|
98
|
|
99
|
Invalid ASCII characters have their own capturing group.
|
100
|
|
101
|
Invalid non-ASCII characters are treated as names, to simplify the matching of
|
102
|
names (except unicode spaces which are treated as whitespace). Note: See also
|
103
|
the [ES2018](#es2018) section.
|
104
|
|
105
|
Regex literals may contain invalid regex syntax. They are still matched as
|
106
|
regex literals. They may also contain repeated regex flags, to keep the regex
|
107
|
simple.
|
108
|
|
109
|
Strings may contain invalid escape sequences.
|
110
|
|
111
|
|
112
|
Limitations
|
113
|
===========
|
114
|
|
115
|
Tokenizing JavaScript using regexes—in fact, _one single regex_—won’t be
|
116
|
perfect. But that’s not the point either.
|
117
|
|
118
|
You may compare jsTokens with [esprima] by using `esprima-compare.js`.
|
119
|
See `npm run esprima-compare`!
|
120
|
|
121
|
[esprima]: http://esprima.org/
|
122
|
|
123
|
### Template string interpolation ###
|
124
|
|
125
|
Template strings are matched as single tokens, from the starting `` ` `` to the
|
126
|
ending `` ` ``, including interpolations (whose tokens are not matched
|
127
|
individually).
|
128
|
|
129
|
Matching template string interpolations requires recursive balancing of `{` and
|
130
|
`}`—something that JavaScript regexes cannot do. Only one level of nesting is
|
131
|
supported.
|
132
|
|
133
|
### Division and regex literals collision ###
|
134
|
|
135
|
Consider this example:
|
136
|
|
137
|
```js
|
138
|
var g = 9.82
|
139
|
var number = bar / 2/g
|
140
|
|
141
|
var regex = / 2/g
|
142
|
```
|
143
|
|
144
|
A human can easily understand that in the `number` line we’re dealing with
|
145
|
division, and in the `regex` line we’re dealing with a regex literal. How come?
|
146
|
Because humans can look at the whole code to put the `/` characters in context.
|
147
|
A JavaScript regex cannot. It only sees forwards. (Well, ES2018 regexes can also
|
148
|
look backwards. See the [ES2018](#es2018) section).
|
149
|
|
150
|
When the `jsTokens` regex scans throught the above, it will see the following
|
151
|
at the end of both the `number` and `regex` rows:
|
152
|
|
153
|
```js
|
154
|
/ 2/g
|
155
|
```
|
156
|
|
157
|
It is then impossible to know if that is a regex literal, or part of an
|
158
|
expression dealing with division.
|
159
|
|
160
|
Here is a similar case:
|
161
|
|
162
|
```js
|
163
|
foo /= 2/g
|
164
|
foo(/= 2/g)
|
165
|
```
|
166
|
|
167
|
The first line divides the `foo` variable with `2/g`. The second line calls the
|
168
|
`foo` function with the regex literal `/= 2/g`. Again, since `jsTokens` only
|
169
|
sees forwards, it cannot tell the two cases apart.
|
170
|
|
171
|
There are some cases where we _can_ tell division and regex literals apart,
|
172
|
though.
|
173
|
|
174
|
First off, we have the simple cases where there’s only one slash in the line:
|
175
|
|
176
|
```js
|
177
|
var foo = 2/g
|
178
|
foo /= 2
|
179
|
```
|
180
|
|
181
|
Regex literals cannot contain newlines, so the above cases are correctly
|
182
|
identified as division. Things are only problematic when there are more than
|
183
|
one non-comment slash in a single line.
|
184
|
|
185
|
Secondly, not every character is a valid regex flag.
|
186
|
|
187
|
```js
|
188
|
var number = bar / 2/e
|
189
|
```
|
190
|
|
191
|
The above example is also correctly identified as division, because `e` is not a
|
192
|
valid regex flag. I initially wanted to future-proof by allowing `[a-zA-Z]*`
|
193
|
(any letter) as flags, but it is not worth it since it increases the amount of
|
194
|
ambigous cases. So only the standard `g`, `m`, `i`, `y` and `u` flags are
|
195
|
allowed. This means that the above example will be identified as division as
|
196
|
long as you don’t rename the `e` variable to some permutation of `gmiyus` 1 to 6
|
197
|
characters long.
|
198
|
|
199
|
Lastly, we can look _forward_ for information.
|
200
|
|
201
|
- If the token following what looks like a regex literal is not valid after a
|
202
|
regex literal, but is valid in a division expression, then the regex literal
|
203
|
is treated as division instead. For example, a flagless regex cannot be
|
204
|
followed by a string, number or name, but all of those three can be the
|
205
|
denominator of a division.
|
206
|
- Generally, if what looks like a regex literal is followed by an operator, the
|
207
|
regex literal is treated as division instead. This is because regexes are
|
208
|
seldomly used with operators (such as `+`, `*`, `&&` and `==`), but division
|
209
|
could likely be part of such an expression.
|
210
|
|
211
|
Please consult the regex source and the test cases for precise information on
|
212
|
when regex or division is matched (should you need to know). In short, you
|
213
|
could sum it up as:
|
214
|
|
215
|
If the end of a statement looks like a regex literal (even if it isn’t), it
|
216
|
will be treated as one. Otherwise it should work as expected (if you write sane
|
217
|
code).
|
218
|
|
219
|
### ES2018 ###
|
220
|
|
221
|
ES2018 added some nice regex improvements to the language.
|
222
|
|
223
|
- [Unicode property escapes] should allow telling names and invalid non-ASCII
|
224
|
characters apart without blowing up the regex size.
|
225
|
- [Lookbehind assertions] should allow matching telling division and regex
|
226
|
literals apart in more cases.
|
227
|
- [Named capture groups] might simplify some things.
|
228
|
|
229
|
These things would be nice to do, but are not critical. They probably have to
|
230
|
wait until the oldest maintained Node.js LTS release supports those features.
|
231
|
|
232
|
[Unicode property escapes]: http://2ality.com/2017/07/regexp-unicode-property-escapes.html
|
233
|
[Lookbehind assertions]: http://2ality.com/2017/05/regexp-lookbehind-assertions.html
|
234
|
[Named capture groups]: http://2ality.com/2017/05/regexp-named-capture-groups.html
|
235
|
|
236
|
|
237
|
License
|
238
|
=======
|
239
|
|
240
|
[MIT](LICENSE).
|