1 |
cb15593b
|
Cajova-Houba
|
# Prophecy
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
[](https://packagist.org/packages/phpspec/prophecy)
|
4 |
|
|
[](https://travis-ci.org/phpspec/prophecy)
|
5 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
Prophecy is a highly opinionated yet very powerful and flexible PHP object mocking
|
7 |
|
|
framework. Though initially it was created to fulfil phpspec2 needs, it is flexible
|
8 |
|
|
enough to be used inside any testing framework out there with minimal effort.
|
9 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
## A simple example
|
11 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
```php
|
13 |
|
|
<?php
|
14 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
class UserTest extends PHPUnit_Framework_TestCase
|
16 |
|
|
{
|
17 |
|
|
private $prophet;
|
18 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
public function testPasswordHashing()
|
20 |
|
|
{
|
21 |
|
|
$hasher = $this->prophet->prophesize('App\Security\Hasher');
|
22 |
|
|
$user = new App\Entity\User($hasher->reveal());
|
23 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
$hasher->generateHash($user, 'qwerty')->willReturn('hashed_pass');
|
25 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
$user->setPassword('qwerty');
|
27 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
$this->assertEquals('hashed_pass', $user->getPassword());
|
29 |
|
|
}
|
30 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
protected function setup()
|
32 |
|
|
{
|
33 |
|
|
$this->prophet = new \Prophecy\Prophet;
|
34 |
|
|
}
|
35 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
protected function tearDown()
|
37 |
|
|
{
|
38 |
|
|
$this->prophet->checkPredictions();
|
39 |
|
|
}
|
40 |
|
|
}
|
41 |
|
|
```
|
42 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
## Installation
|
44 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
### Prerequisites
|
46 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
Prophecy requires PHP 5.3.3 or greater.
|
48 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
### Setup through composer
|
50 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
First, add Prophecy to the list of dependencies inside your `composer.json`:
|
52 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
```json
|
54 |
|
|
{
|
55 |
|
|
"require-dev": {
|
56 |
|
|
"phpspec/prophecy": "~1.0"
|
57 |
|
|
}
|
58 |
|
|
}
|
59 |
|
|
```
|
60 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
Then simply install it with composer:
|
62 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
```bash
|
64 |
|
|
$> composer install --prefer-dist
|
65 |
|
|
```
|
66 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
You can read more about Composer on its [official webpage](http://getcomposer.org).
|
68 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
## How to use it
|
70 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
First of all, in Prophecy every word has a logical meaning, even the name of the library
|
72 |
|
|
itself (Prophecy). When you start feeling that, you'll become very fluid with this
|
73 |
|
|
tool.
|
74 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
For example, Prophecy has been named that way because it concentrates on describing the future
|
76 |
|
|
behavior of objects with very limited knowledge about them. But as with any other prophecy,
|
77 |
|
|
those object prophecies can't create themselves - there should be a Prophet:
|
78 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
```php
|
80 |
|
|
$prophet = new Prophecy\Prophet;
|
81 |
|
|
```
|
82 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
The Prophet creates prophecies by *prophesizing* them:
|
84 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
```php
|
86 |
|
|
$prophecy = $prophet->prophesize();
|
87 |
|
|
```
|
88 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
The result of the `prophesize()` method call is a new object of class `ObjectProphecy`. Yes,
|
90 |
|
|
that's your specific object prophecy, which describes how your object would behave
|
91 |
|
|
in the near future. But first, you need to specify which object you're talking about,
|
92 |
|
|
right?
|
93 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
```php
|
95 |
|
|
$prophecy->willExtend('stdClass');
|
96 |
|
|
$prophecy->willImplement('SessionHandlerInterface');
|
97 |
|
|
```
|
98 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
There are 2 interesting calls - `willExtend` and `willImplement`. The first one tells
|
100 |
|
|
object prophecy that our object should extend specific class, the second one says that
|
101 |
|
|
it should implement some interface. Obviously, objects in PHP can implement multiple
|
102 |
|
|
interfaces, but extend only one parent class.
|
103 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
### Dummies
|
105 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
Ok, now we have our object prophecy. What can we do with it? First of all, we can get
|
107 |
|
|
our object *dummy* by revealing its prophecy:
|
108 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
```php
|
110 |
|
|
$dummy = $prophecy->reveal();
|
111 |
|
|
```
|
112 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
The `$dummy` variable now holds a special dummy object. Dummy objects are objects that extend
|
114 |
|
|
and/or implement preset classes/interfaces by overriding all their public methods. The key
|
115 |
|
|
point about dummies is that they do not hold any logic - they just do nothing. Any method
|
116 |
|
|
of the dummy will always return `null` and the dummy will never throw any exceptions.
|
117 |
|
|
Dummy is your friend if you don't care about the actual behavior of this double and just need
|
118 |
|
|
a token object to satisfy a method typehint.
|
119 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
You need to understand one thing - a dummy is not a prophecy. Your object prophecy is still
|
121 |
|
|
assigned to `$prophecy` variable and in order to manipulate with your expectations, you
|
122 |
|
|
should work with it. `$dummy` is a dummy - a simple php object that tries to fulfil your
|
123 |
|
|
prophecy.
|
124 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
### Stubs
|
126 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
Ok, now we know how to create basic prophecies and reveal dummies from them. That's
|
128 |
|
|
awesome if we don't care about our _doubles_ (objects that reflect originals)
|
129 |
|
|
interactions. If we do, we need to use *stubs* or *mocks*.
|
130 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
A stub is an object double, which doesn't have any expectations about the object behavior,
|
132 |
|
|
but when put in specific environment, behaves in specific way. Ok, I know, it's cryptic,
|
133 |
|
|
but bear with me for a minute. Simply put, a stub is a dummy, which depending on the called
|
134 |
|
|
method signature does different things (has logic). To create stubs in Prophecy:
|
135 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
```php
|
137 |
|
|
$prophecy->read('123')->willReturn('value');
|
138 |
|
|
```
|
139 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
Oh wow. We've just made an arbitrary call on the object prophecy? Yes, we did. And this
|
141 |
|
|
call returned us a new object instance of class `MethodProphecy`. Yep, that's a specific
|
142 |
|
|
method with arguments prophecy. Method prophecies give you the ability to create method
|
143 |
|
|
promises or predictions. We'll talk about method predictions later in the _Mocks_ section.
|
144 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
#### Promises
|
146 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
Promises are logical blocks, that represent your fictional methods in prophecy terms
|
148 |
|
|
and they are handled by the `MethodProphecy::will(PromiseInterface $promise)` method.
|
149 |
|
|
As a matter of fact, the call that we made earlier (`willReturn('value')`) is a simple
|
150 |
|
|
shortcut to:
|
151 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
```php
|
153 |
|
|
$prophecy->read('123')->will(new Prophecy\Promise\ReturnPromise(array('value')));
|
154 |
|
|
```
|
155 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
This promise will cause any call to our double's `read()` method with exactly one
|
157 |
|
|
argument - `'123'` to always return `'value'`. But that's only for this
|
158 |
|
|
promise, there's plenty others you can use:
|
159 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
- `ReturnPromise` or `->willReturn(1)` - returns a value from a method call
|
161 |
|
|
- `ReturnArgumentPromise` or `->willReturnArgument($index)` - returns the nth method argument from call
|
162 |
|
|
- `ThrowPromise` or `->willThrow($exception)` - causes the method to throw specific exception
|
163 |
|
|
- `CallbackPromise` or `->will($callback)` - gives you a quick way to define your own custom logic
|
164 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
Keep in mind, that you can always add even more promises by implementing
|
166 |
|
|
`Prophecy\Promise\PromiseInterface`.
|
167 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
#### Method prophecies idempotency
|
169 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
Prophecy enforces same method prophecies and, as a consequence, same promises and
|
171 |
|
|
predictions for the same method calls with the same arguments. This means:
|
172 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
```php
|
174 |
|
|
$methodProphecy1 = $prophecy->read('123');
|
175 |
|
|
$methodProphecy2 = $prophecy->read('123');
|
176 |
|
|
$methodProphecy3 = $prophecy->read('321');
|
177 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
$methodProphecy1 === $methodProphecy2;
|
179 |
|
|
$methodProphecy1 !== $methodProphecy3;
|
180 |
|
|
```
|
181 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
That's interesting, right? Now you might ask me how would you define more complex
|
183 |
|
|
behaviors where some method call changes behavior of others. In PHPUnit or Mockery
|
184 |
|
|
you do that by predicting how many times your method will be called. In Prophecy,
|
185 |
|
|
you'll use promises for that:
|
186 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
```php
|
188 |
|
|
$user->getName()->willReturn(null);
|
189 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
// For PHP 5.4
|
191 |
|
|
$user->setName('everzet')->will(function () {
|
192 |
|
|
$this->getName()->willReturn('everzet');
|
193 |
|
|
});
|
194 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
// For PHP 5.3
|
196 |
|
|
$user->setName('everzet')->will(function ($args, $user) {
|
197 |
|
|
$user->getName()->willReturn('everzet');
|
198 |
|
|
});
|
199 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
// Or
|
201 |
|
|
$user->setName('everzet')->will(function ($args) use ($user) {
|
202 |
|
|
$user->getName()->willReturn('everzet');
|
203 |
|
|
});
|
204 |
|
|
```
|
205 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
And now it doesn't matter how many times or in which order your methods are called.
|
207 |
|
|
What matters is their behaviors and how well you faked it.
|
208 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
#### Arguments wildcarding
|
210 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
The previous example is awesome (at least I hope it is for you), but that's not
|
212 |
|
|
optimal enough. We hardcoded `'everzet'` in our expectation. Isn't there a better
|
213 |
|
|
way? In fact there is, but it involves understanding what this `'everzet'`
|
214 |
|
|
actually is.
|
215 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
You see, even if method arguments used during method prophecy creation look
|
217 |
|
|
like simple method arguments, in reality they are not. They are argument token
|
218 |
|
|
wildcards. As a matter of fact, `->setName('everzet')` looks like a simple call just
|
219 |
|
|
because Prophecy automatically transforms it under the hood into:
|
220 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
```php
|
222 |
|
|
$user->setName(new Prophecy\Argument\Token\ExactValueToken('everzet'));
|
223 |
|
|
```
|
224 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
Those argument tokens are simple PHP classes, that implement
|
226 |
|
|
`Prophecy\Argument\Token\TokenInterface` and tell Prophecy how to compare real arguments
|
227 |
|
|
with your expectations. And yes, those classnames are damn big. That's why there's a
|
228 |
|
|
shortcut class `Prophecy\Argument`, which you can use to create tokens like that:
|
229 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
```php
|
231 |
|
|
use Prophecy\Argument;
|
232 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
$user->setName(Argument::exact('everzet'));
|
234 |
|
|
```
|
235 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
`ExactValueToken` is not very useful in our case as it forced us to hardcode the username.
|
237 |
|
|
That's why Prophecy comes bundled with a bunch of other tokens:
|
238 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
- `IdenticalValueToken` or `Argument::is($value)` - checks that the argument is identical to a specific value
|
240 |
|
|
- `ExactValueToken` or `Argument::exact($value)` - checks that the argument matches a specific value
|
241 |
|
|
- `TypeToken` or `Argument::type($typeOrClass)` - checks that the argument matches a specific type or
|
242 |
|
|
classname
|
243 |
|
|
- `ObjectStateToken` or `Argument::which($method, $value)` - checks that the argument method returns
|
244 |
|
|
a specific value
|
245 |
|
|
- `CallbackToken` or `Argument::that(callback)` - checks that the argument matches a custom callback
|
246 |
|
|
- `AnyValueToken` or `Argument::any()` - matches any argument
|
247 |
|
|
- `AnyValuesToken` or `Argument::cetera()` - matches any arguments to the rest of the signature
|
248 |
|
|
- `StringContainsToken` or `Argument::containingString($value)` - checks that the argument contains a specific string value
|
249 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
And you can add even more by implementing `TokenInterface` with your own custom classes.
|
251 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
So, let's refactor our initial `{set,get}Name()` logic with argument tokens:
|
253 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
```php
|
255 |
|
|
use Prophecy\Argument;
|
256 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
$user->getName()->willReturn(null);
|
258 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
// For PHP 5.4
|
260 |
|
|
$user->setName(Argument::type('string'))->will(function ($args) {
|
261 |
|
|
$this->getName()->willReturn($args[0]);
|
262 |
|
|
});
|
263 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
// For PHP 5.3
|
265 |
|
|
$user->setName(Argument::type('string'))->will(function ($args, $user) {
|
266 |
|
|
$user->getName()->willReturn($args[0]);
|
267 |
|
|
});
|
268 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
// Or
|
270 |
|
|
$user->setName(Argument::type('string'))->will(function ($args) use ($user) {
|
271 |
|
|
$user->getName()->willReturn($args[0]);
|
272 |
|
|
});
|
273 |
|
|
```
|
274 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
That's it. Now our `{set,get}Name()` prophecy will work with any string argument provided to it.
|
276 |
|
|
We've just described how our stub object should behave, even though the original object could have
|
277 |
|
|
no behavior whatsoever.
|
278 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
One last bit about arguments now. You might ask, what happens in case of:
|
280 |
|
|
|
281 |
|
|
```php
|
282 |
|
|
use Prophecy\Argument;
|
283 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
$user->getName()->willReturn(null);
|
285 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
// For PHP 5.4
|
287 |
|
|
$user->setName(Argument::type('string'))->will(function ($args) {
|
288 |
|
|
$this->getName()->willReturn($args[0]);
|
289 |
|
|
});
|
290 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
// For PHP 5.3
|
292 |
|
|
$user->setName(Argument::type('string'))->will(function ($args, $user) {
|
293 |
|
|
$user->getName()->willReturn($args[0]);
|
294 |
|
|
});
|
295 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
// Or
|
297 |
|
|
$user->setName(Argument::type('string'))->will(function ($args) use ($user) {
|
298 |
|
|
$user->getName()->willReturn($args[0]);
|
299 |
|
|
});
|
300 |
|
|
|
301 |
|
|
$user->setName(Argument::any())->will(function () {
|
302 |
|
|
});
|
303 |
|
|
```
|
304 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
Nothing. Your stub will continue behaving the way it did before. That's because of how
|
306 |
|
|
arguments wildcarding works. Every argument token type has a different score level, which
|
307 |
|
|
wildcard then uses to calculate the final arguments match score and use the method prophecy
|
308 |
|
|
promise that has the highest score. In this case, `Argument::type()` in case of success
|
309 |
|
|
scores `5` and `Argument::any()` scores `3`. So the type token wins, as does the first
|
310 |
|
|
`setName()` method prophecy and its promise. The simple rule of thumb - more precise token
|
311 |
|
|
always wins.
|
312 |
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
#### Getting stub objects
|
314 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
Ok, now we know how to define our prophecy method promises, let's get our stub from
|
316 |
|
|
it:
|
317 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
```php
|
319 |
|
|
$stub = $prophecy->reveal();
|
320 |
|
|
```
|
321 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
|
As you might see, the only difference between how we get dummies and stubs is that with
|
323 |
|
|
stubs we describe every object conversation instead of just agreeing with `null` returns
|
324 |
|
|
(object being *dummy*). As a matter of fact, after you define your first promise
|
325 |
|
|
(method call), Prophecy will force you to define all the communications - it throws
|
326 |
|
|
the `UnexpectedCallException` for any call you didn't describe with object prophecy before
|
327 |
|
|
calling it on a stub.
|
328 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
### Mocks
|
330 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
Now we know how to define doubles without behavior (dummies) and doubles with behavior, but
|
332 |
|
|
no expectations (stubs). What's left is doubles for which we have some expectations. These
|
333 |
|
|
are called mocks and in Prophecy they look almost exactly the same as stubs, except that
|
334 |
|
|
they define *predictions* instead of *promises* on method prophecies:
|
335 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
```php
|
337 |
|
|
$entityManager->flush()->shouldBeCalled();
|
338 |
|
|
```
|
339 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
#### Predictions
|
341 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
The `shouldBeCalled()` method here assigns `CallPrediction` to our method prophecy.
|
343 |
|
|
Predictions are a delayed behavior check for your prophecies. You see, during the entire lifetime
|
344 |
|
|
of your doubles, Prophecy records every single call you're making against it inside your
|
345 |
|
|
code. After that, Prophecy can use this collected information to check if it matches defined
|
346 |
|
|
predictions. You can assign predictions to method prophecies using the
|
347 |
|
|
`MethodProphecy::should(PredictionInterface $prediction)` method. As a matter of fact,
|
348 |
|
|
the `shouldBeCalled()` method we used earlier is just a shortcut to:
|
349 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
```php
|
351 |
|
|
$entityManager->flush()->should(new Prophecy\Prediction\CallPrediction());
|
352 |
|
|
```
|
353 |
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
It checks if your method of interest (that matches both the method name and the arguments wildcard)
|
355 |
|
|
was called 1 or more times. If the prediction failed then it throws an exception. When does this
|
356 |
|
|
check happen? Whenever you call `checkPredictions()` on the main Prophet object:
|
357 |
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
```php
|
359 |
|
|
$prophet->checkPredictions();
|
360 |
|
|
```
|
361 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
In PHPUnit, you would want to put this call into the `tearDown()` method. If no predictions
|
363 |
|
|
are defined, it would do nothing. So it won't harm to call it after every test.
|
364 |
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
There are plenty more predictions you can play with:
|
366 |
|
|
|
367 |
|
|
- `CallPrediction` or `shouldBeCalled()` - checks that the method has been called 1 or more times
|
368 |
|
|
- `NoCallsPrediction` or `shouldNotBeCalled()` - checks that the method has not been called
|
369 |
|
|
- `CallTimesPrediction` or `shouldBeCalledTimes($count)` - checks that the method has been called
|
370 |
|
|
`$count` times
|
371 |
|
|
- `CallbackPrediction` or `should($callback)` - checks the method against your own custom callback
|
372 |
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
Of course, you can always create your own custom prediction any time by implementing
|
374 |
|
|
`PredictionInterface`.
|
375 |
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
### Spies
|
377 |
|
|
|
378 |
|
|
The last bit of awesomeness in Prophecy is out-of-the-box spies support. As I said in the previous
|
379 |
|
|
section, Prophecy records every call made during the double's entire lifetime. This means
|
380 |
|
|
you don't need to record predictions in order to check them. You can also do it
|
381 |
|
|
manually by using the `MethodProphecy::shouldHave(PredictionInterface $prediction)` method:
|
382 |
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
```php
|
384 |
|
|
$em = $prophet->prophesize('Doctrine\ORM\EntityManager');
|
385 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
$controller->createUser($em->reveal());
|
387 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
|
$em->flush()->shouldHaveBeenCalled();
|
389 |
|
|
```
|
390 |
|
|
|
391 |
|
|
Such manipulation with doubles is called spying. And with Prophecy it just works.
|